← The Arsenal9 / 13How We Keep Score →
Presentation
Home
The Debrief — 10 Sections
01 — The Business02 — What's Broken03 — The Growth Plan04 — Making Marc the Authority05 — The 4,50006 — The 20,00007 — The Arsenal08 — How We Operate09 — How We Keep Score10 — Day One
Tools
ScorecardTech Stack
Skip to content Skip to footer
0 items - $0.00 0

How We Operate

How We Operate — Ernest Gilmore × MWA
Section 08
How We
Operate
Most candidates present strategy and leave the room without ever addressing how they’d actually work inside the firm. I’ve read the EOS structure, I understand the Level 10 format, I know what I own autonomously and what requires Marc’s sign-off. Here’s how I understand the operating structure — before I’ve been asked a single question about it.
EOS — Entrepreneurial Operating System  ·  Level 10 cadence  ·  Every Tuesday 9:00 AM CST
Organizational Structure
MW
Marc Whitehead
CEO / Owner  ·  Final authority
Major vendor contracts, strategic direction, annual budget modifications. 20-year succession context — maintains full strategic control throughout.
RR
Robert Rose
Fractional CMO  ·  $4,500/month
Strategic guidance, monthly review, vendor evaluation. Does not manage day-to-day operations. I bring him data before opinions.
EG
Ernest Gilmore
Director of Marketing  ·  This role
Full P&L responsibility for $2M+ budget. Campaign optimization, vendor management, team leadership, weekly Level 10 scorecard ownership.
MA
Marketing Assistant
Reports to Marketing Director
Content, newsletters, social, HubSpot execution, vendor day-to-day coordination.
BDM
Business Development Manager
Reports to Marketing Director
Professional referral relationships — attorneys, medical professionals, CPAs. Medical network expansion primary objective.
ET
Erika Torres
Intake Manager  ·  Peer / Partner
10-person intake team. 1,500–2,000 leads/month. Regular communication on lead quality and source performance. My closest feedback loop.
$2,500
My autonomous authority
Monthly budget reallocations between existing campaigns — no pre-approval required. I move fast within this threshold.
Tuesday
9:00 AM CST · Every week
EOS Level 10. 90 minutes maximum. I own the scorecard presentation and the IDS agenda. This meeting is never missed.
3 tiers
Decision authority levels
What I decide alone, what goes to the Level 10, and what requires Marc’s final sign-off. I know the difference before I need to use it.
$4,500
Robert Rose · Monthly
Fractional CMO. Strategic guidance, monthly review. I bring him data before opinions and flag pivots before making them.
Decision Authority
Three tiers.
I know which is which.

One of the ways a new Marketing Director damages trust fastest is by overstepping authority early — making decisions that should go to the Level 10 or to Marc without surfacing them first. The opposite failure is equally damaging: bringing every tactical decision to Marc and creating unnecessary overhead for firm leadership.

The $2,500 autonomous threshold is clear. The Level 10 approval requirements are clear. Marc’s final authority list is clear. I’m not going to need someone to remind me which category a decision falls into. Here’s how I understand each tier before I walk in the door.

I
● Marketing Director — Autonomous
What I decide
without asking
≤ $2,500 / month
Tactical decisions within the approved budget. I move fast here — waiting for approval on a bid adjustment or a landing page test costs more than the decision itself. The expectation: these decisions are documented in the weekly Level 10 scorecard so Marc sees what I’m doing, even if I didn’t ask first.
Campaign optimizations — bid adjustments, match type changes, audience exclusions
Budget reallocations up to $2,500/month between existing campaigns
Content creation — blog posts, social, email campaigns within approved budgets
Vendor performance discussions and optimization requests
A/B testing, landing page optimization, conversion improvements
Tactical adjustments within strategic parameters already approved
II
◎ Level 10 Meeting — Team Approval
What goes to
the Tuesday table
> $2,500 reallocation
Decisions that affect strategic direction, vendor relationships, or budget allocations above my autonomous threshold. I come to these discussions with a recommendation and a data rationale — not a question. Marc and the team may modify the recommendation, but I’m not asking for permission. I’m presenting a position.
Budget reallocations exceeding $2,500 between channels or practice areas
New initiative testing — Hispanic market scaling, new channel additions
Vendor contract changes — rate negotiations, scope modifications
Strategic pivots or major campaign restructuring decisions
Issues directly threatening the 20% growth target trajectory
IDS items requiring team input before resolution
III
◎ Marc Whitehead — Final Authority
What only Marc
can approve
Major commitments
Decisions that affect the firm’s long-term direction, major vendor relationships, or annual budget structure. I never surprise Marc with these. I surface them early, bring the data that supports the recommendation, and make the ask clearly. Marc’s approval isn’t a bottleneck — it’s a checkpoint that protects both of us.
Annual marketing budget modifications — changes greater than 10% of the total
Major vendor changes — new contracts exceeding $5,000/month, vendor terminations
Strategic direction changes — new practice area marketing, major geographic expansion
Long-term investment commitments — PR firm extensions, multi-year contracts
Hennessy Digital replacement decision — if the 60-day gate is not met
How I Think About Authority

“The $2,500 threshold isn’t a ceiling on my thinking — it’s a ceiling on my spending without alignment. I can think as strategically as I want about anything. But I don’t move budget above that threshold without surfacing it at the Level 10 first. That discipline builds the trust that eventually earns more autonomy.”

The Weekly Meeting
Level 10 —
how I run Tuesday morning.
Every Tuesday at 9:00 AM CST
90 minutes maximum — hard stop
Participants: Marc Whitehead, Marketing Director, Marketing Assistant, BDM
Format: EOS Level 10 structure — standard agenda, no deviation
My ownership: Scorecard presentation, Rock review, IDS agenda, action item commitments
9:00
Scorecard Review
15 minutes
I present the weekly scorecard — no narrative, just numbers against targets. Lead volume by source and practice area. Cost per case vs. targets. Case signup progress toward the 20% growth goal. If a number is off-target, I come with the diagnosis and the proposed response — not just the bad news. The scorecard is pre-built in HubSpot/Salesforce and pulled before 8:30 AM Tuesday.
Lead volume by source CPCase vs. targets Case signups vs. 20% goal Vendor performance highlights CallRail attribution
9:15
Rock Review
15 minutes
Quarterly initiative status — Red, Yellow, Green. No discussion unless something is Red and needs the IDS. I lead the Rock review for all marketing-specific quarterly initiatives and come with progress percentages, not feelings. If a Rock is at risk, it goes straight to the IDS list with a proposed resolution.
Q1 rock status — Red / Yellow / Green Blockers flagged for IDS % complete by initiative
9:30
Customer / Employee Headlines
10 minutes
Good news and bad news from the field. Client feedback, team updates, market developments, competitor moves, AI search developments. One sentence each — this is not a discussion segment. Headlines that need discussion get moved to the IDS. I curate the marketing headlines; Erika Torres brings the intake team perspective.
Client feedback AI search developments Team updates Market news
9:40
To-Do List Review
10 minutes
Done or not done — no discussion. Every action item I committed to last Tuesday either got done or it didn’t. If it didn’t, it goes to the IDS with an explanation. Carryovers that are blocking a Rock or an initiative get IDS priority that week. I track my own To-Do completion rate and if it drops below 90%, I treat that as a personal process problem to solve — not explain.
Done / not done — no narrative Carryovers to IDS if blocking
9:50
IDS — Identify, Discuss, Solve
40 minutes  ·  The real meeting
This is where the decisions get made. I bring a pre-prioritized issues list — highest business impact first. Every issue I put on the IDS has a proposed solution. I’m not surfacing problems for discussion. I’m surfacing decisions that need the room. Budget reallocations above $2,500, vendor escalations, strategic pivots, anything threatening the 20% growth target. Marc gives final approval on anything that crosses his threshold. Everything else gets resolved in the 40 minutes.
Budget reallocations >$2,500 Vendor escalations Strategic pivots Growth target threats Marc’s final approvals
10:30
Conclude — Commitments Confirmed
Hard stop
New To-Dos assigned with owners and due dates. Cascading messages confirmed — what gets communicated to the broader team and by whom. Next Level 10 confirmed: Tuesday, 9:00 AM. The meeting ends on time. Every time.
The Team
Who I lead.
How I lead them.

Two direct reports. One key peer. One fractional strategic partner. That’s the immediate operating team. My philosophy on all of them is the same: clarity on priorities beats frequency of direction. I don’t manage by standing over people. I set the quarterly objectives clearly, build the content calendar 60 days ahead, run the weekly check-in efficiently, and stay available when something breaks.

The Marketing Assistant already knows how to execute. The BDM already has a relationship focus. What they need from a new Director isn’t a reorganization or a new framework. It’s a clear priority stack and someone who removes blockers instead of creating them. That’s the leadership posture I bring from Day One.

RR
Robert Rose  ·  Fractional CMO
Strategic Partner  ·  $4,500/month  ·  Monthly review cadence
Robert is the strategic oversight layer above me — not a manager, not a day-to-day operator, but someone whose perspective I value and whose alignment I need on major strategic decisions. I bring him data before opinions. I flag pivots before making them. I defer on strategic disagreements while making the case with numbers. If Robert and I disagree on a direction, I don’t go around him — I make the data-backed argument and then defer to the decision that gets made. That’s not weakness. That’s how you build the kind of trust that earns more authority over time. Monthly strategic review, competitive analysis, vendor evaluation. I prepare a data package before every session — never show up to a Robert Rose meeting without something to show.
MA
Marketing Assistant
Reports to Marketing Director
The execution engine. Content creation, social media management, newsletter production, HubSpot administration, and day-to-day vendor coordination with The Vault. Already knows the operational cadence — my job is to give them a clear content calendar 60 days ahead and remove the ambiguity that slows execution. I review their output weekly, not daily. The distinction is intentional: oversight without micromanagement builds capability faster than constant supervision.
Priorities set by: Marketing Director · Reviewed: Weekly · Vendor coordination: The Vault, content vendors · HubSpot execution: All drip sequences and email campaigns
BD
Business Development Manager
Reports to Marketing Director
The relationship builder. Focus: professional referral relationships — attorneys in the 4,500 network, medical professionals in the LTD pipeline, CPAs and financial advisors. Primary Q2 objective: medical professional network expansion — 25 new physician contacts per month. I set the strategy and the outreach targets; the BDM executes the relationships. We meet weekly to review pipeline, prioritize outreach, and align on which attorneys need a personal call from me versus from them that week.
Priority Q2: Medical professional network · Attorney outreach: Top Tier personal calls 3–4/week combined · Weekly sync: Pipeline review + outreach priorities · HubSpot: All relationship data tracked
ET
Erika Torres
Intake Manager  ·  Peer & Feedback Loop
Erika manages the 10-person intake team processing 1,500–2,000 leads every month. She’s not a direct report — she’s the most important feedback loop I have. When Erika tells me the SSD lead quality is improving after match type changes, that’s the signal the PPC fix is working. When she flags that VA calls are taking longer to qualify, that tells me something about the pre-filing nurture sequence. I talk to Erika regularly — not just at the Level 10. Her team’s daily experience is the ground truth that validates or invalidates every campaign decision I make upstream.
Meeting cadence: Weekly touch + Level 10 · Purpose: Lead quality feedback, source performance, intake alignment · Data shared: CallRail source data, HubSpot lead scoring, CPL by campaign
Vendor Consultation Protocols
When I consult before
I move.

Each vendor relationship has specific consultation requirements — the decisions I can make independently versus the ones that require a conversation before implementation. These aren’t bureaucratic gates. They’re the boundaries that protect the vendor relationships from unnecessary disruption and protect the firm from decisions made without enough context.

My process is the same for every vendor consultation: prepare the recommendation with data and rationale, surface it at the Level 10, get alignment, then coordinate with the vendor. Nothing moves to a vendor until the internal decision is made. No vendor hears about a strategic change from me before Marc does.

Hennessy Digital
Consultation required before —
Budget reallocations exceeding $5,000 between campaigns or practice areas
Campaign strategy changes — new keyword approach, audience targeting shifts, bidding strategy overhaul
Geographic expansion decisions — moving from Texas-focused to national campaigns
Vendor replacement consideration — must present data to Marc before any replacement conversation begins
AIEO content restructuring that affects core landing pages or URL structure
Roux Advertising
Consultation required before —
Creative changes — new scripts, new visual treatments, new practice area messaging
Budget adjustments — flight schedule changes, market weight shifts, production cost approvals
Market expansion — adding new DMAs or shifting Houston market weighting
Attribution methodology changes — how the halo effect is measured and reported
The Vault
Consultation required before —
Newsletter design changes — template, layout, or brand presentation modifications
Distribution list modifications — adding or removing recipient segments
Frequency adjustments — adding, removing, or shifting newsletter or gift cadences
New program additions — new postcard campaigns, new gift programs beyond current scope
Bucaram PR Group
Consultation required before —
Strategy alignment shifts — changing priority angles, target publication focus, or positioning
Campaign integration changes — how PR connects to paid social, content, or event calendar
Measurement expectation changes — adding new KPIs or adjusting success criteria
Renewal or expansion decisions at the 6-month mark — requires my attribution report to Marc first
Reporting Cadence
What Marc sees.
When he sees it.

Reporting transparency is the foundation of operational trust. Marc should never have to ask how marketing is performing — the data should arrive before the question does. Three reporting cadences: weekly scorecard at the Level 10, monthly dashboard with full ROI analysis, and quarterly strategic review with budget allocation recommendations. Each one is built to answer the question Marc cares about most: are we on track to hit 180–288 cases per month by December 2026?

Weekly  ·  Level 10 Meeting
The Tuesday Scorecard
Lead volume by source and practice area — week-over-week and vs. targets
Cost per lead and cost per case vs. targets — SSD $400, VA $500–600, LTD $1,667
Case signups progress toward the 20% growth goal — weekly pace tracking
Vendor performance issues or optimization opportunities — flagged before they become crises
Budget spend tracking against monthly allocations — no surprises on overage
CallRail attribution summary — source breakdown, missed calls, HubSpot sync status
Attorney referral count — vs. 290/quarter pace, Frequent Flyer highlights
Monthly  ·  Marketing Dashboard
Full ROI Analysis
Comprehensive ROI analysis — all channels and all practice areas, not just the highlights
Vendor performance scorecards — Hennessy, Roux, The Vault, Bucaram rated against defined expectations
Growth initiative progress — all five initiatives, current status, pace to quarterly targets
Budget reallocation recommendations based on channel performance data
Lead quality trends — conversion rate by source, intake feedback integration
AI citation audit — DisabilityDenials.com visibility in AI search tools
PR attribution — placements, branded search lift, speaking engagements
Quarterly  ·  Strategic Review
Growth Target Assessment
Progress toward 20% annual goal — cases per month vs. 180–288 target, trajectory
Budget allocation optimization — reallocation recommendations between practice areas for Q+1
New channel testing decisions — Hispanic market scaling, national expansion timing
Vendor relationship review — contract renewals, performance improvement plans, termination considerations
Strategic initiative adjustments — continue, pivot, or discontinue decisions with data rationale
Robert Rose strategic alignment — CMO review of quarterly direction and H2 planning
What I’d Say in the Room

“I’ve operated inside EOS before. The Level 10 format isn’t new to me — it’s how I prefer to work. Data before opinions. Flag pivots before making them. Bring a recommendation, not a question. The Tuesday scorecard that I’d present to Marc every week is already built in the Scorecard section of this presentation. That’s not a prototype. That’s the actual format.”